Is long run history relevant for thinking about how we will adapt to climate change? I don't think so. Our world economy is changing so rapidly that I learn little about our future ability to adapt from 16th century Europe.He goes on to write that Parker "ignores the role that capitalism plays as an evolutionary force in helping us to adapt to new challenges. He ignores the innovative possibilities of modern capitalism." Maybe so, but history might have a thing or two to say about where the faith in "the innovative possibilities of modern capitalism" comes from, as well as the relationship between this faith and the employment of Darwinian concepts.
The crossroads of environmental history and legal history (and other related fields)
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Environmental history, capitalism, and adaptation to climate change
Here's someone who doesn't think we can learn very much from history about climate change (and apparently thinks that Geoffrey Parker, a great military historian, is just another "Ph.D. historian", of which there are apparently too many. Though he does grant that "Dr. Parker has some interesting things to say".) Matthew Kahn writes on his blog:
Labels:
capitalism,
climate,
Darwin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete